Home » Warhammer won't top DAoC when it was at its peak

Add new comment

Re: Warhammer won't top DAoC when it was at its peak

WESSEXSLAYER (not verified) on July 14, 2006 - 13:11.

Wow with 1 million+ subscribers. I cant understand why.
Its pvp content is a joke
Server crashes and sudden spikes in connection rates are to me its biggest downfalls.
SWG again its like a deserted island where pvp especially since its revamp has died a death.e
Dungeons and Dragons - i just hate it completely . personally i cant see any difference in it being a warrior or a mage. they both seem to have the same effects,

The three things that i think warhammer AOR have over its rivals is
:-
Detailed Content and background history (ok so gamesworkshop has stolen ideas from other sources).
PVP - How many games out there are really designed around massed pvp with armies etc. I would say none so far. WOW and SWG for example wars and conflict, but in reality its pvp content is an afterthought and almost non existent.
-- Of course wow are now trying to introduce more pvp content in their next atch, but i wonder is it because of Warhammer AOR.

:- Hopefully graphics and servers will be far more upto date. Though looking at DAOC i hope they use a movement template akin with wow, as its damm sluggish and a load of hassle on DAOC.

PLEASE PLEASE what ever warhammer brings and i hope its alot
But i reckon and hope that finallly we have a game for true pvpers who want massed battles and not one on ones or pve instances all the time. and oh yes lets hope the server

In terms of games i come from Warhammer AD&D and strategy pc games like empire and red alert etc. It would be nice to see large battles where players lead regiments of npcs in seige and massed warfare for example

FINALLY BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD AND LET THE BATTLE COMMENCE

Reply

You are not authorized to post comments.