The Pied Piper of Hamelin

I post and break my own rules again because I don't like to leave things open and because I don't want to push the flames any further in the place that produced all this.

I'm referring to the thread on F13, the first post from Mark Jacobs, my reply later on the thread, and all that happened afterwards.

Lum took offense and I should have imagined that before writing what I wrote. But my point wasn't against Lum, his site, the bans and all the drama. My critics were about what happened AFTERWARDS. The U-turn in Mythic's stance toward the community. The order from Mark Jacobs to Mythic's staff to never post again on those forums. The delegitimization of the community that legitimated them in the first place. And then, along the years, the progressive, constant deterioration of that relationship with the community.

In fact I always PRAISED what Mythic *was* doing on ltm/SND as I always praised devs that are genuinely interested in a discussion and that keep in touch with the community. Those who know me also know that I always sided for a more open, sincere and constructive relationship and nothing changed in my stance.

I DO believe that ltm/SND was the real "Camelot Herald" but I also believe that the good feedback wasn't malicious and it was also coming from that close relationship. Keeping in touch with the community, interpret its needs. I do believe that that process was positive both for Mythic, DAoC and the players. But as I said there was an U-turn at some point, that I identified with that post from Mark Jacobs I quoted and that then progressed along the years. Till today. Today Mythic is completely out of touch with the community and that is also one of the reasons why what is left of DAoC is only a very pale shade.

Why I went necroposting that quote? Because it was happening again. It was as new as it has always been.

My point is very simple: I don't believe that Mark Jacobs is genuinely interested in a discussion.

That request to open a private forum for him was stupid and wrong on many levels. Mark Jacobs NEVER looked for an honest, passionate discussion. He NEVER participated in our communities. He NEVER gave a damn about anything if not "bullying" his community of choice tricking people to welcome him like a king by promising gifts, beta slots and "WAR swag".

There are other devs that ARE part of our communities. Brad McQuaid has often used FoH's forums in the last years to hype his game, Smed and in particular Scott Hartsman also participated in our discussions and today Scott is one of the most respected and esteemed out there BECAUSE of his attitude and sincerity in dealing with the community. The newly born GMG also had a strong presence on the forums and blogs. Raph Koster has always been everywhere and the one who THE MOST always looked for a real participation, who really wanted and encouraged that dialogue more than anyone else.

So what's the difference between all these people (and I left out MANY) and Mark Jacobs? That ALL these peoples have demonstrated along the months and the years that their interest is GENUINE. That they share a passion and that they are interested in a real dialogue.

Mark Jacobs has NEVER given a damn about anything. If not appearing a few days ago on F13 after not having written ONE post in more than two years and abruptly asking them to open a private forum for him where he could do as he please and feel (along with his game) the center of the attention (actually he's even confused about what he's asking). When I saw a bunch of long time members of this community taking the "bait" I felt the need to say what I said.

In the meantime he flamed me back, trying to make believe that I registered on F13 just to troll him. Excuse me, my ideas may be considered shit, but I think I HAVE demonstrated along these years that my passion in these games is SINCERE and that I do love to talk about game design and that I DO look for that kind of constructive, collaborative dialogue MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE ON THE INTERNET. And sorry if I'm not modest in this case, but my passion is not questionable. With this site and my constant participation in the community I believe that AT LEAST I demonstrated that.

If Mark Jacobs was TRULY interested in a participation with the community then he would have done it before. There are hundreds of ways to look for and have that dialogue. From blogs that would fit exactly his selective mindset, as they allow you to discuss what you want to discuss, give credit to who you want to give credit and ignore who you want to ignore, to forums of all kinds.

Other devs are already encouraging that dialogue without any stupid dedicated private forum to bully. But the real point is that, private forum or not, Mark Jacobs couldn't care less about that kind of involvement and participation. Because he thinks he is superior to all that. And because of that superiority he went asking for the "special treatment" that NO OTHER DEV has never even imagined to ask before.

As on a game forum it is valid the principle: "Who you are is secondary and what matters is that we are equals talking about games".

So what you say and not the color of your name.

Asking to open a private forum devoted to you and where you decide who has the right to speak and who doesn't, surely isn't a good way to encourage an honest and unbiased discussion. It's just an attempt to manipulate things as you please. Later in that thread (and in a MILLION of other occasions) we have demonstrated that we can have that meaningful, honest discussion about games without the need of any private forum or special policies. But of course Mark Jacobs deserted the thread at that point.

In the end I do HATE perpetuating drama and flames because it stresses and empties me to no end and I don't take back any satisfaction. If Mark Jacobs is honestly interested discussing games and ideas then he is more then welcome to prove me wrong. I'm just forcing him to drop his mask.

(and my apologies to Lum because he was brought in a wrong discussion)

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

Bit of a mess...

You make a lot of valid points man, but people do not respond well to "in your face" type dialog. I am as passionate as you are about making sure something gets done right, but you *have* to bring it down a notch if you're to get respect. The comments you made after the meltdown on F13 felt like a overcompensating attempt to prove that you're there to talk about Game Design. Whether you were trying to do that or not, that's how it was perceived to me.

When you bring what Jacobs says up to the light in your own special way, yeah, it does sound fishy. I don't know him well enough and haven't personally worked with him to know whether he's full of it or he's being sincere. I can only really make that type of judgement about the people I work with at my job. What I do know about the people I work with is that they are *very busy*. As fishy as what Mark wanted, he made a lot of valid points as well about why he wanted the forum, the benefits of it, and, taking into consideration his position in life, why he wouldn't want to continually engage in public discourse.

I think there's a whole 'nother "legal and business" side to this discussion that you haven't broached and aren't taking into consideration. Sure, you'd like credit for your ideas, but by publically posting them on here, you're essentially giving up your rights to them, so if someone were to take advantage of it, they'd owe you nothing. I'd like to shoot the shit about my game ideas, but I know that if I want to ever do anything with the ideas I truly believe in, I can never, ever tell anyone about them that I don't trust.

Still, I like coming on here and reading what you write. There's a certain je ne se qua about it that I find appealing and refreshing. I come on here, and your words are here without anything really blocking me from seeing them. Seriously, if I was to start a blog, I'd probably model it after this one. How did you acquire this software? :) If you're going to stop writing, I may as well start, but I don't think I could ever come up to par with the level of detail and discussion you bring to the table.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

Wow.... just wow...

I think that forum should be under the definition of internet. There are quite a few well written insightful posts but then there are these hideous troll and flame posts that make me want to close my browser so I don't get stupid from them.

The point being that 'design' without implementation is irrelevant. I could 'design' a flying car but if the theoretical is never tested in the practical sense then it's absolutely worthless. So no, you haven't really designed anything because your ideas exist outside of any practical context. Design is about the elegant achievement of a goal within environmental constraints. Your abstracts don't do this ergo they are not designs at all, they're theories at best.
-Squirrel

This guy can go f*** himself. Has he been to a University before? All they teach are abstracts, most with barely any practical context. The point is that those abstracts let you look at things from a more dynamic context. It allows for creativity to fill in the gaps between theory and purpose.

A one page summary on a what something might do is as much design as the code running in the final product. Design is a process and not just a result. The philosophy behind a design is as intergral to success as the methods used to create a product. Look at how many scientific theories have sat unproven over the years before someone else had the resources to finally prove it?

I guess he didn't hear about the relic things in the DAoC expansion either.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

Agreed. I just read through the entire flame thread in question and that post by squirrel just reeks of the appeal to authority fallacy. If there's one thing my years on this earth have taught me, it's that one should never blindly acquiesce to experience about anything.

Saying you are unable to comment on design if you have never shipped a AAA title is daft. I've never made a movie. I'm still well placed to say Uwe Boll is a shit director.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

The issue is how you came across. I enjoy your writings (though they tend to be long winded) as do others at f13, but at times your diatribes come across as vague and self pompous. The fact that you came back swinging for a few posts did not help get your message across.

Cheddar

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

As an FYI... At the time Savant tried to get me fired from my job a Bayer. He failed of course but the fact remains that it was just some "forum banning" that occured. My house was getting calls all hours of the night and day, ranging from hang-ups to death threats. Why? Because someone dared ask if LTM blog had been bought.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

Actually, no, abalieno, you were well out of order on that thread. You were out of order, and virtually every poster in the thread who commented on your behaviour said so, especially schild (in the festivus thread) and a couple of mods.

We were having an interesting discussion, and MJ joined in: MJ certainly has an insight that I am keen to hear. Then you turn up, bleating yet again about how you've been mistreated and ignored so often, and derailing a fun thread into self-pitying psychodrama. Just because you don't want to have a discussion with someone gives you no right whatsoever to prevent others doing so.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

F13 is known for being outspoken and saying things bluntly and honestly. Opening a private server on his request is a way to not say things this way and bias what is being said to please him.

It works when we are in the pre-beta honeymoon, but things would go downhill when it will be time to see and call things with their true name.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

You clearly misunderstood what he was suggesting: it was not pre-beta, nor anything specifically to do with the Warhammer beta or product. It was a general game design forum with dev access.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

Honestly I think I know what MJ is going for here: He wants a forum where everyone can post ideas that he can rip off for WAR without properly compensation.

"Hey, I've got this great idea for a PVP system..."
"Wow! Thats great. We're using that for WAR. Here's a beta invite and a hat, now we're going to go make lots of money!"

I know WoW refrains from posting in their suggestion forum for this very reason, and asking for a private forum where everyone's ideas are in the public domain just reeks of lazy devs. You want game design ideas? Then HIRE people who know how to make games. Don't beg for handouts for free on a forum then act like you're doing people favors.

(Funny to me that everyone reacted largely to the fact that he wanted the forum invite only and not the public domain thing.)

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

The secret of getting your Idea's across is to not piss off the people that can make it happen.

Tact is a quality you might need to learn my friend.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

Honesty and lack of hypocrisy are qualities I'm not willingly to give up ;)

I don't need or want to persuade other people about my ideas, either. What I want(ed) to do is reach out for those who are on the same line. Others may sit out, watch and make their own ideas.

Instead in THIS case I just wanted to force Mark Jacobs to drop his mask. And he did. If now other people still see the mask, it's not important. I didn't look for consensus against Mark. I didn't want to drive a protest against him.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

With all due respect HRose, instead of making Mark J look bad, you made yourself look like a jackass.

I'm actually on your side, I understand what you were trying to do and I salute you for it. But there is a RIGHT way and a WRONG way of going about it.

The RIGHT way would have been to state your beef with Mark, let him respond, make your conclusion and call it a day.

The Wrong way is to keep badgering him. Nothing good will ever come out of constantly provoking a person. There was alot of people that actually wanted to hear what Mark said.

I think you lifted Marks "mask" in your first post, no need to keep twisting the dagger.

Re: The Pied Piper of Hamelin

The people defending Jacobs both in the thread and in this comment section, have obviously forgotten the pompous ass that is Mark Jacobs. This is the same guy that claimed he "invented MUDS and hence all MMO's"...this is the dude that instead of listening to his community, decided to drop kick customer service onto the VN boards, installed some pissy 15 year old moderators as the "message keepers", then told them to fuck off after all. A mate and I were actually discussing this trend. Back when DAOC was fresh, the dev's didn't give two shits, they brought out expansions, patches, items, changes, class balances that no one wanted, needed or could even possibly see a reason for. All in the name of allmighty Jacobs and Firor, that piece of shit shill. Now looky? When Jacobs and his lackeys fucked off to do the drop kick that was their little Rome in Space headfuck, the Live team actually managed to implement some OKish changes. When they started to do WAR full time, the live team actually started implementing things that people have been crying for 4+ years (Hello Warden shield spec, how are you?).

You can't have a constructive discussion with a narcistic maniac and expect to even get through, much less achieve anything.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.