How to start a book? (I don't like the first word of 'The Way of Kings')

It seems there's some stir today as Tor begins to promote Sanderson's latest and most ambitious epic. I'm enjoying the atmosphere, honestly. In spite of all the seemingly negative things I've written about Sanderson I still said I plan to buy the book on day 1 and read it. I also expect at the very least to enjoy it. But if it doesn't offer something that stands apart the next volumes will probably sit back on the reading pile.

Anyway, part of the promotion are the first 50 pages or so of the book, right now. Or at least Prologue and Prelude, the rest requires some sort of registration.

I haven't read that, and I will likely wait for the full book before commenting, but that first word is a very bad way to start a book, especially for something that is going to span 10 books.

This isn't really criticism to Sanderson, it's just that I always thought it's awful to open a book with a first name. "Kakak rounded a rocky stone ridge". Why should I care? First names are something you acquire. They are meaningful when they define someone you know. But throwing the name before everything else is like an unnatural thrust into a character that expects you to know him already. It's like forcing familiarity to the reader without earning that familiarity.

Let's make examples. I have recently written about Pynchon, so take Gravity's Rainbow:

- A screaming comes across the sky.

That's a hell of way to start a book. It sets the tone and definitely lacerates the curtain to let the reader in. (I appreciate the present tense)

Another of Pynchon I have here:

- "Now single up all lines!"

Yeah! Let's fly!

Philip Roth:

- She was so deeply imbedded in my consciousness that for the first year of school I seem to have believed that each of my teachers was my mother in disguise.

I guess literary guys know how to begin their books.

James Joyce, Finnegans Wake.

- A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.

No comment.

Gene Wolfe's New Sun:

- "It is possible I already had some presentiment of my future."

It couldn't have set the tone and eccentricity any better.

David Copperfield:

- Whether I shall turn out to be the hero of my own life, or whether that station will be held by anybody else, these pages must show.

Well yes, I'm unfair. You can't beat that.

R. Scott Bakker:

- One cannot rise walls against what has been forgotten.

That's Bakker. It's him telling it's him. "Hey, it's me."

Glen Cook:

- There were prodigies and portents enough, One-Eye says.

This gets a first name, but as you see the precedence is given to what is being said, which fits.

Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead:

- Howard Roark laughed.

OK. First name. BUT IT IS AYN RAND. If she isn't allowed to open a book with a first name than no one else can.

Which naturally leads to Terry Goodkind:

- It was an odd-looking vine.

...Huh?

Re: How to start a book? (I don't like the first word of 'The Wa

"The man in black fled across the dessert, and the gunslinger followed"

Re: How to start a book? (I don't like the first word of 'The Wa

"The first I knew about the civil war was when my sister Aurien poisoned me."

Re: How to start a book? (I don't like the first word of 'The Wa

Interesting post. But is it truly a rule that a writer can't throw out first names without giving details to the reader or is it just a preference that a tone be set and some background given before names be thrown about? I think this is one of the great things about books and movies, the endless amount of creative material and impact one can have on their medium. Also, our ability to debate to death each piece that is made.
With that said, even if I began a book with the line, "William was a lonely boy..." I don't think I am jumping the gun as long as I give the reader enough about William and his background to move the story along at the pace I need it to go (maybe I do not want some things revealed about William until later in the story). Anyway, my point is that I understand what you are saying and love the quotes you put in your post, but if done correctly, as you mentioned with Ayn Rand, then throwing a name in the beginning is fine. If you want me to end this post with an opening line from a book then here you go:

"If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you'll probably want to know is where I was born, and what my lousy childhood was like, and how my parents were occupied and all before they had me, and all that David Copperfield kind of crap, but I don't feel like going into it, if you want to know the truth."
-J.D. Salinger The Catcher In The Rye

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.