Subscriptions
Submitted by Abalieno on May 3, 2007 - 16:42.
As recent as last week:
We've never been shy about letting the community know approximations of the number of active subscriptions (approaching 170k), trial accounts (about 22k), peak concurrent users (34,420), staff (201), etc. Information like that is normally mentioned on the forums or in news items, so it may be hard to spot. Most of the forum regulars see the numbers and will generally pass the information along to those that ask.
Just the renovation of all the 3D models in EVE (not including the graphics engine) is about 80 people.
EVE is still growing rapidly, we're about 2000 short of 170.000 paying subscribers. Not counting EVE China or trials.
Reaching 160K at christmas, Jan and Feb were slow, now going on 170K. That's paying subscribers.
They seem now bigger than Mythic. But I guess it depends on what you consider "staff".
Of those 201, 150 are working on Eve. The rest? I don't know, but CCP is working on different projects.
And about this specific gripe, they also have something interesting to say:
player: There used to be a time when the only thing CCP thought about, and MORE IMPORTANTLY, every individual at CCP ever thought about was EVE. This was the core group of developers that made EVE, that launched EVE, that imbued EVE with life. This core group of developers is now sundered both in their minds and at thier company.
Oveur: The new MMO is being made in Atlanta to prevent this from happening. A new team is being built there to prevent this from happening.
I drink the Kool-Aid, the fact that the WoD game is being built elsewhere wipes most of my concerns. Good work.
Submitted by Abalieno on February 20, 2007 - 04:00.
Fifth article in a series! A couple of weeks ago NCSoft release their quarterly reports about subscription numbers and financial status.
The .zip file with the original pdf document can be downloaded here.
Summary:
- Tabula Rasa close to beta and to be released in second half of 2007.
- Guild Wars skips the "spring" expansion, only one expansion to be released near the end of the year.
- Lineage 2 breaking 100k subs in the western market.
- CoH/CoV falling back to 150k.
- "All pass" service in the works (one monthly fee for all games).
Raw numbers:
Lineage
1,408,170 subs worldwide (+52,200)
11,953 in the US (+2,226)
Lineage II
1,036,303 subs worldwide (-80,624)
105,039 in US + EU (+11,039)
City of Heroes
154,953 subs worldwide (that is US + EU only) (-17,467)
Guild Wars
3,122,000 boxes sold (+675,000)
Lineage is doing pretty well and currently has 400k more than its sequel. This should give a hint to all those mmorpg companies that continue to abandon their games to build stupid sequels that cannot even top the original. I repeat: in this genre sequels are stupid for a long list of reasons, and this is valid even for the "disguised" sequels, not just for those games sharing the exact same name. Anyway, Lineage seems stable or slightly growing everywhere and I also noticed the "personal accounts" are rising. Someone knows how much Koreans pay monthly?
Lineage 2 instead is like Lineage in reverse (sales went up 2% for Lineage and down 2% for Lineage 2), while one is stable but slightly growing, the other is slightly declining and losing subscriptions in a consolidated downward trend. The only point of notice is that the game is becoming successful in the western market and now has more than 100k. I'm impressed. I don't know from where these players are coming (maybe the consequence of NCSoft aggressively countering the "free shards"?) and I DEFINITELY cannot understand what players like in this game. Maybe the lust for PvP make people digest all sort of crap. I wonder what could happen if there was in the market a vaguely decent PvP game.
CoH is losing a sensible number of subscriptions but I saw that coming. The development stalled as the staff was moved to other projects. I read that they released a new patch recently, so the subscriptions may slightly rise in the next quarter, but I doubt this game has an interesting, bright future. As for the binomial DAoC/Warhammer, only one can survive between CoH/CoV and the Marvel-branded title in the works. The game is on a (albeit long) countdown and will likely sink over time as its appeal fades (obviously that's not something they are going to admit).
Consolidated City of Heroes/Villains franchise sales were 5.5 billion Won, down 26% QoQ due to a decrease in user base.
Not much to say about Guild Wars. In the last report I wrote that the Nightfall release made them sell another 500k and reach 3M total, so the number was already updated. It seems holding rather well. The real interesting thing is that they seem to have discarded the plan of one expansion every six months as only one is planned for this year and to be released around the release of Nightfall a year ago (October). I wonder if this is still a viable business choice.
Overall from a superficial glance at other numbers it seems that the only market sensibly growing is the European one (+68%). While the profit for the full year 06 is down a -43% over the 05. Sales are stable, while costs went up (also because of Auto Assault trainwreck).
It's interesting to see their previsions for 2007. They expect Lineage 2 to go up by a 12%, CoH and Guild Wars to lose 15% and between a +969% and +1313% for "other" games. This last number is actually believable and even conservative as they are launching new stuff this year (Aion in Korea and Dungeon Runners and Tabula Rasa in the western market).
For 2007 business goals, NCsoft is anticipating sales to be between 358 billion Won and 367 billion Won, a 6% to 8% increase from the previous year. Operating profit is expected to be between 42 billion Won, with little change YoY and 49 billion Won, a 13% increase year over year. This guidance reflects Tabula Rasa, Aion, and several casual games officially launching within year 2007.
NCsoft’s total investment in product development (Live update cost + new game development cost) grew to approximately 90 billion Won last year from 25 billion Won in 2003. In 2007, this investment is expected to grow to 108billion Won, a 18% increase from the previous year. This strong commitment in product development reflects NCsoft’s strategy to build a strong portfolio of products to keep up with growth in online game market, that is expected to grow 30% a year.
NCsoft has built a development system to introduce at least one blockbuster MMO games and several casual online games a year. To do this, NCsoft spent 64 billion Won for new game development in 2006. This amount will grow to 80 billion Won in 2007.
I hope some of those go to Lum ;)
Tabula Rasa and Aion will officially launch in the second half of 2007, meaning that sales contribution from these products will be limited to some extent. However, games launches have certain costs associated with them, such as the purchase of game servers, the hiring game masters, and marking expenses. For these reasons, profit margin in 2007 could be lower than our mid-term target margin 20%.
In North America & Europe, Exteel, a mech shooter game and Dungeon Runners, a multiplayer action role-playing game, will officially launch in the first half of 2007. These multiplayer games will be free to download and play at the basic levels of gameplay. Additional contents will be available for a fee (in-game item sales and membership packages).
Tabula Rasa, a highly anticipated MMO, will enter a closed beta testing stage soon and will officially launch in the second half of 2007. Also an additional update to the Guild Wars franchise will go live in the second half of 2007.
As I'm against RMT I don't like what they are doing with Exteel and Dungeon Runners. As I wrote in the past I'm willingly to pay for content, but not pay for items or other unjustified smoke and mirrors.
Finally, they also announced an "all pass" monthly subscription working along the lines of SOE one. So you can play all NCSoft games while paying one unified monthly fee, but I guess you still have to purchase the single games and eventual expansions. We'll see if NCSoft will be able to provide a better deal.
Submitted by Abalieno on January 24, 2007 - 23:09.
In a recent comment I wrote that I don't like much Eve's current direction. I'm done commenting game design so I won't go in detail, but here some meaningful quotes.
The first comes from a dev blog and demonstrates I wasn't so wrong:
Invention was supposed to be the revolutionary feature of Revelations and should have changed the entire science and industry genre as we know it, with the potential side effect that could change the biggest part of the player economy; Tech 2.
However, the effect that invention was supposed to bring has not yet been seen.
Only a couple players had managed to build an interface.
Then we can pass to give a look at Eve current development schedule. For reference you can use the previous battleplan and the E3 news.
The biggest disappointment to me is that the main feature of Kali seems completely GONE from their plans. Not delayed, gone. They used to describe the whole expansion as:
The upcoming expansion to EVE Online—codenamed Kali—will introduce an innovative Advanced Reactive Content System (ARCS), in which the political landscape and physical borders of nation-states within the game can be altered dynamically through the collective outcome of player actions, thus directly controlling the game universe destiny and resulting storyline.
This was in the form of "Factional Warfare" that I described throughly, analyzed in design potential and praised as one of the most interesting thing ever.
Gone.
In their dev blogs there aren't anymore references to Factional Warfare. The Kali patch isn't anymore named Kali, but "Revelations". And the three chunks (Spetember 06, December 06 and April 07) once again delayed. Oveur:
The engine itself is a bit different, depending on whether you are talking about our optimizations to our DX7/9 engine or the optional Vista engine - or the actual combination of both which is the big package. Currently, the big bada-boom is in Revelations 3 at the end of the year.
"End of the year" almost surely meaning you won't see anything till 2008 and later. Another full year delay on top of the year delay on their 2006 plans.
Don't mock me when I think of Vaporware when they talk about walking on stations with models turning their head dynamically toward noise to simulate human behaviours. From a dev blog:
This brings us to an area of computer graphics called dynamic avatar human-to-human interaction. It tries to apply knowledge derived from years of research of human body language into the actions of computer generated avatars, so that their behavior mimics human behavior without the user or NPC controller micro-managing every little twitch of the body or glance of the eyes.
This is one of the areas that we intend to research and apply to our animation system.
V - A - P - O - R - W - A - R - E
But I was writing about Factional Warfare. You would think that CCP has OODLES of time if they waste it on this kind of TOTALLY USELESS (and very, very pretentious) shit. Oveur says that Revelation 3 at the end of 2007 will be the engine upgrade to Vista. So Factional Warfare is for Revelation 2? From a dev blog:
Following Revelations 1.4, we'll be refocusing our efforts on Revelations 2. It was covered at fanfest, that we have the hots for warfare in Revelations 2 on all levels. But what does warfare & the increased emphasis on improving current content rather than adding new stuff really mean?
So "Warfare". No more "Factional"? Why? Just playing with names? Not adding more "new stuff"?
Uhm, no. It looks like the "increased emphasis on improving current content" means that the "Factional" is gone. Or at least that's what I understand when they describe the new "Warfare" without the "Factional":
We want to improve the goalsetting in warfare, by improving and adding options to player buildable infrastructure. This means improving Starbases, Outposts, Stations and Sovereignty. However, Warfare also needs something to fight with, so we want more tactical and strategic components there.
As you can imagine, this isn't only for the people shooting, this creates goals for everyone, a fighter can't survive without his industrial backbone. The industrialists must build the infrastructure and the merchants are there to supply the essentials you can't acquire yourself. It's all interconnected.
Then they go commenting fleet combat changes. Uhm, that's a blatant U-turn. Factional Warfare was about everything but combat.
The orginal Factional Warfare was NOTHING about big ass fleet combat and uber guild PVP. It was instead a "bridge" between casual players and those big corps. It was a way to make the NPC empires an active part of the game. The kind of work that Eve needs from a very long time. See the quote above about the "Advanced Reactive Content System". Or the bottom level of the Factional Warfare right from their own description:
The initial idea is that players can elect to take on missions as mercenaries - in which case the reward will be mainly monetary - or as enlisted soldiers, where they will be rewarded with increased standings and discounted ships and equipment. With the contract system in place alongside it, FW can be something individuals or even alliances can sign up to, with contracts for single missions or for the duration of a long-term campaign.
Whether through trade, bounty hunting, resource allocation or even combat, FW is entwined with the very EVEness of Eve itself. It is where the rich background of Eve will come to life.
This is all gone. Now "Warfare" just means a patch that will affect fleet combat. It's a combat mechanic patch. Nothing about the original plan. Not even close. It's a completely different direction.
Which couldn't be put more clearly:
all Warfare improvements in Revelations 2 are aiming for the same thing. Even though it's improving current features, it's encouraging gameplay which not only is more fun and easier to jump into, it's also good for the general performance of EVE.
Time to backfire on CCP? Is this the result of TomB replacing Lekjart as Lead Designer? Quoting myself at that time:
Of course these are all early claims with no substance. Yet. But mmorpgs are long term projects and the shit that happens *today* is crucial for tomorrow. When everyone will have already forgot what happened and what brought the change of pace.
Of course all these delays also mean that CCP staff is so idle and bored that they decided to keep themselves busy by working on a new MMO.
And to conclude, subscriptions news that you can compare with my previous report:
less than 20% of the EVE community have 2 or more subscriptions. The other 80+% are single account users.
We have just over 156k subscriptions and an average of 15k active trial accounts as of the reported metrics at the beginning of the month. There were 34,420 players logged in on Tranquility Sunday afternoon.
Sir Bruce, the owner of mmogchart.com is a great guy.
Submitted by Abalieno on January 11, 2007 - 21:05.
Reporting this because they give us relevant infos:
more than 2 million players in North America, more than 1.5 million players in Europe, and more than 3.5 million players in China.
My previous considerations were both right and wrong:
if nothing changes we would see the subscriptions climbing at above 8 million just by the end of September.
If that's true it would be a safe bet saying that the NA subscribers will climb above 2M BEFORE the launch of the expansion. Again, I doubt it. We'll see if I'm wrong but I'm not so sure that the NA subscribers are even above 1.5M. That would disprove the data we have now, though. But that's my suspect.
An average of the two and we are there.
What I can see now is that the growth is still rather constant. This would mean that by the end of 2007 WoW would reach 10M worldwide, but this without counting the effect of the expansion (and the competition, but I don't think there are any real competitors yet).
It's possible that the expansion alone will give the game another 1M in our market (US+EU) easily. That 1/3-1/4 growth is what I would expect. We'll see.
Also interesting to consider that both US and EU market seem to grow at a similar pace. About half a million every year.
August 2005 - 1M in the US
January 2006 - 1M in the EU (with US probably at 1.5)
January 2007 - 2M in the US, 1.5M in the EU
Those being official numbers.
My suspect here is that the growth slowed down during the 2006. But the imminent launch of the expansion already gave these numbers a boost. The 2M in NA would already include some returning players that are getting ready for the expansion launch. So the point is: how many more subscribers, beside those already back, the expansion will bring to the game?
Submitted by Abalieno on December 15, 2006 - 00:37.
What a perfect occasion to write about something I left behind. My notes and comments on NCSoft seasonal reports.
Fourth article in a series.
The .zip file with the original pdf document can be downloaded here.
Summary:
- Lineage I&II and CoH stable
- Guild Wars doing "okay"
- Dungeon Runners still not here
- Tabula Rasa not in sight
But let's start from Guild Wars. I was going to archive the press release when I noticed this part:
Reconnect After Disconnect — One of the most player-requested features comes to Guild Wars! If a player gets dropped from the game due to a connection problem, and that player can reconnect within ten minutes, the player's character will be relocated to the spot of disconnection. If the character was performing an action, such as casting a spell or auto-attacking a target, that character will complete the action as if still connected. If a player is in a group when disconnected, the other members of the party will be notified about the player's connection problems.
WOOOOOT!
At last! It's since I played for the first time in beta that I ask for that. Finally my first complaint got resolved and I'm happy. Good work.
The press release was to announce they sold 3 Millions of boxes:
December 13, 2006 (BELLEVUE, WA) — Fueled by sales of the hit game Guild Wars NightfallTM, the latest release in the award-winning Guild Wars® franchise, sales for one of the world's leading subscription-free online roleplaying games have surpassed three million units worldwide in a little more than a year and a half.
Notes:
- That's the cumulative number of all three expansions. That would mean: Prophecies + Factions + Nightfall = 3M
- As of September 06 they were at 2.4M, so Nightfall has sold around 500k till now (roughly).
Raw numbers:
Lineage
1,355,970 subs worldwide (-43,939)
9,727 in the US (+42)
Lineage II
1,116,927 subs worldwide (-22,001)
94,000 in US + EU (+10,779)
City of Heroes
172,420 subs worldwide (that is US + EU only) (+1,420)
There's not the need to go in detail for each as the situation seems stable in all three cases. I'm quite surprised that CoH is holding that well. This year it didn't have the help of the release of a major expansion as it happened a year ago with CoV. Since its release CoH sat at around 170k and aside the highs and lows it's still holding surprisingly well, especially for a game whose development cycle I consider particularly lacking. As it is happening to CCP also Cryptic is now busy with the development of a brand new game (for Marvel) so I'm quite sure CoH will be left progressively behind as their efforts concentrate more on the "new". It will be interesting how the game will perform in the next months. For now it is doing much better than how I would have "predicted".
There's also a positive note:
We are revising up our guidance for year 2006 to 339 billion Won on the top line from 330 billion Won and 39 billion Won in operating profit from 20 billion Won.
The primary reasons for the increase in profits are: (i) better-than-expected sales for the world’s leading MMORPG franchise Lineage, Lineage II, and City of Heroes/Villains, (ii) decrease in major costs such as payroll and advertising, and (iii) the one-time write-off of Auto Assault-related expenses in Q2, which amounted to roughly 11.2 billion Won.
It's actually odd because as written above the two Lineages are holding well, but they hardly seem doing "better than expected", so there must be something going on behind the scenes that I cannot find with this superficial glance.
For retrospective it's also worth going back to the beginning of the year and give a better look at that "performance":
First report of the year: earnings guidance 353 billion Won, down from 396 - operating profit 50 billion Won, down from 66
Second report : earnings guidance 330 billion Won, down from 353 - operating profit 20 billion Won, down from 50
Third (and last: earning guidance 339 billion Won, up from 330 - operating profit 39 billion Won, up from 20
In 2005 the sales were 338 billion Won and profit much higher, 76 billion Won (-49%).
The drop in the second report was due to not so good results of Guild Wars and the Auto Assault write off.
From the second report:
In North America and Europe, NCsoft will launch multiplayer online games such as Dungeon Runners in Q4, 2006, followed by Exteel and Soccer Fury.
Tabula Rasa will enter a limited closed beta testing stage during the second half of 2006.
A bit behind the schedules. I wonder how far Tabula Rasa is from release. Maybe May 07?
With Nightfall out I'm now waiting for the first reports about Guild Wars spring's expansion. It will be interesting to see in which direction they will go. The game needs a "shift", something that can rise some hype.
Submitted by Abalieno on December 5, 2006 - 04:41.
It was confirmed on the boards, so I take the occasion to report it.
Eve-Online had 145k this November (it was at 142k at the beginning of September, so it's sitting more or less on the same level) and it's fair to assume that it gained at least another 10k with the release of the latest patch/expansion.
The number of concurrent players seem to confirm this as they hit another record this Sunday, bordering 33k online at the same time.
I was also trying to compare Eve numbers with City of Heroes numbers to see if I could find a pattern in common, as it's another game we have detailed statistics about. But I noticed that CoH has a very odd and irregular behaviour with the subs/concurrent user peak ratio. Maybe I'll comment about this later.
Submitted by Abalieno on September 5, 2006 - 18:18.
Yesterday Eve-Online had more than 30k players active online (30.538).
Active subscribers are currently at 142k.
I wish I could say the same about DAoC.
In the meantime I'm waiting CCP to actually develop and show something. They patched recently but it was just a whole lot of work on the backend in preparation for Kali (performance improvements are always great, though). I was expecting that patch to come for the end of July, instead it arrived for the end of August. Still no mention when we'll finally see something done. What about the Battleplan?
I cannot avoid to think to Mythic everytime. They are like one the negative image of the other. Eve-Online has a great direction, a growing, dedicated team, but still cannot manage to develop things at an acceptable pace and respect deadlines (but, despite this, the growth of players is rewarding them even if development is super slow). Instead DAoC has a bad direction, a costantly shrinking dev team and ambition to "feed" Warhammer, but they always respect deadlines (but the players feel directly that the project is just being left behind and are trickling off).
When is Kali One coming, you ask? I'd like to see it in the end of September, but Dragon still needs maintenance on TQ, so we can't assign as many resources over to the final push of Kali One as we wanted.
The communication through the dev blogs is excellent, though. Thanks a lot. That's the VERY BEST communication I've seen in this industry so far.
If someone from CCP passes here: could we have a "dev tracker" page with links to dev posts on the forums? That would be nice.
P.S.
That blog from Tuxford about fleet battles is great (you can still see in the dev blog with the title "post vacation thoughts"). Good ideas as well. Reduce the range of ships, formation flight, AoE weapons and directional defences. All great. The problem is to get them in the game in the foreseeable future. Should I remind you that formation flight was promised for release? ;p
Usually the large battles are completely ignored in game design and nothing is made to make them more fun and interesting.
Submitted by Innsmouth on September 2, 2006 - 12:47.
Raph does SirBruce and found another investor presentation from Vivendi.
Or maybe not. In fact it the same I already commented, but I was somewhat fooled and went analyzing again the whole thing.
Here is some extrapolated data/best guesses I taken out from the graph, comparing it with the other official sources.
March 05 - 1.4 western [graph] - 550 eu - 850 na [March 17 press release, 500k eu - 800k us]
June 05 - 1.8 (+4) western [graph] - 850 (+3) eu - 950 na (+1)
September 05 - 2 (+2) western (+2) [graph] - 900 eu (+0.5) - 1.1 na (+1.5) [August 30 press release, 1M us]
December 05 - 2.4 (+4) western [graph] - 950 (+0.5) eu 1.4 na (+3)
March 06 - 2.7 (+3) western [graph] - 1.1 (+1.5) eu - 1.6 na (+2) [January 19 press release, 1M eu]
March 05 to 06 - (+1.3M) western - (+ 550) eu - (+750) us
March 05 to 06 - (+4M?) eastern
March 05 to 06 - (+5M) worldwide
However the graph seems a bit imprecise. If we follow the progress of the official press releases this is what we have:
March 17: 1.5M worldwide
June 14: 2M worldwide
August 30: 4M worldwide
November 8: 4.5M worldwide
December 20: 5M worldwide
January 19: 5.5 worldwide
February 28: 6M worldwide
May 10: 6.5M worldwide
The substantial jump between June and August is because of the launch in China. If we follow just the data coming from the press releases this is how the graph would look:
The red line is the progression shown on the graph, the blue line the progress shown through the press releases. They are similar but I guess they tried to make the graph and the progression look more uniform.
In November they launched in Taiwan. Now my suspect is that the graph was slightly rigged to show better numbers for the western market and impress the investors. I believe that the curve is flatter than that and that the ratio could be more unbalanced toward the eastern market if we consider all the elements.
Let's have a glance at the future. The trend of the red curve is rather stable, so it's possible to extend it ideally. Well, if nothing changes we would see the subscriptions climbing at above 8 million just by the end of September. But, hey, it IS September and no other press releases arrived from Blizzard. No 7M worldwide being surpassed. If we also take into consideration the last quarters +2 or +3 on the NA market we would also have the subscriptions for NA dangerously near or above 2M. While if we take the progression from March to September of the last year we would have instead a +2.5, putting the NA subscribers at around 1.8/1.9M *right now*.
If that's true it would be a safe bet saying that the NA subscribers will climb above 2M BEFORE the launch of the expansion. Again, I doubt it. We'll see if I'm wrong but I'm not so sure that the NA subscribers are even above 1.5M. That would disprove the data we have now, though. But that's my suspect.
I'll wait to see if there will be new announces about our market in the next few months that disproves my theories.
--
Honestly, I wasn't expecting the NA market to show that kind of growth between the summer of the last year and now. I thought that the european market would have surpassed it at some point. Instead, if the data on that graph is correct, not only it is still smaller than the NA one, but also growing more slowly. While my estimate gave the NA players at around 1.3M right now, nearly at zero growth. Instead the game is still growing.
It would be interesting to see the results of the 2Q and 3Q 2006 on that graph as it is much more interesting to see how things are going right now that the game is launched in every major region, with the expansion still months away.
I agree with what Raph wrote here:
Given that curve, we can see that WoW likely has not yet stopped growing. It has a tremendous amount of headroom in Asia, and maybe another couple of quarters worth of growth in the West. It looks to me like WoW will crest around 3.5m in the West. Asia is anyone’s guess; the curve can be severely “kinked” by the appearance of a major competitor, and Asia is more likely to create one of those than the West, in my estimation.
With the difference that I think that a major competitor could appear in Asia, but affecting exclusively asian players as I don't have even an ounce of faith that one of those mmorpgs in development such as Huxley, Sun and all those new titles popping up every day is going to draw much attention in our market.
But hey, there's Warhammer. It plugs right in a kind of gameplay that is completely screward in WoW: the PvP. So it could become a better answer to a demand coming from the players. DAoC in the last years has been more popular in europe than in NA. WoW demonstrated that the european market is at least as big as the NA one, you just need the right offer. Moreover it seems to me that european players are much more inclined toward a PvP game and the Warhammer brand has always been stronger here.
Ideally Mythic *could* be Blizzard's most serious competitor.
Submitted by Abalieno on August 11, 2006 - 15:45.
Third article in a series, this time also F13 gave a quick glance at NCSoft subs numbers and financial results.
The .zip file with the original pdf document can be downloaded here.
To begin with, the official words about the results and their plans for the near future:
We have reduced our previous earnings guidance to 330 billion Won from 353 billion Won on the top line and to 20 billion Won from 50 billion Won in operating profit. While Lineage franchise sales remained steady, this revision in guidance reflects Auto Assault’s poor sales performance and lowered Guild Wars sales projection as compared with our previous forecast.
Guild Wars Nightfall, the third and latest campaign in the Guild Wars franchise will launch globally in the second half of 2006.
In North America and Europe, NCsoft will launch multiplayer online games such as Dungeon Runners in Q4, 2006, followed by Exteel and Soccer Fury.
Tabula Rasa will enter a limited closed beta testing stage during the second half of 2006.
Summary:
- Unsurprising bad sales for Auto Assault (as SirBruce anticipated)
- Not so good as expected sales for Guild Wars recent standalone expansion
- Dungeon Runners out before the end of the year
- Tabula Rasa still not near release (as anticipated)
There are so many numbers in these reports that it's not so easy to draw conclusions but Auto Assault is actually the main reason why they reported a net loss. F13 says that the net loss was of ~US$230,000, while there would have been a net income of ~US$12.8 million without the Auto Assault write off. Oddly enough 1 million Korean Won is about the same of 1 million dollars.
The subs numbers are something I can digest better. Extrapolated data:
Lineage
1,399,909 subs worldwide
9,685 in the US
There was a huge drop of 800k in the first quarter of this year. The negative trend continues but not as bad as it was, the game loses only another 100k or so in the last three months. F13 says the subs are decreasing but still better than how they were a year ago, but from what I see this isn't true. Exactly one year ago Lineage exceeded 1.8M of active subs. So 400k more than what it has right now. To notice that in December of the last year it had more than 2.2 millions. It basically lost 1 million in six months. In the US the game is stable around those 9k.
Lineage II
1,138,928 subs worldwide
83,221 in US + EU
The game lost 200k from December to March, now it loses another 200k from March to June. During the last year this game lost half of the players it had in Korea and now the numbers don't look anymore all that crazy as they were. It was holding well because of the launch in China, but even there it went from 700k to 200k in the span of a year. Even in this case I don't see how the claim on F13 is correct since the game had more than 1.8 millions during the same period of the last year, that's 700k less, not more. It's also interesting to notice that in Korea the highest concurrent users peak has remained relaitively constant, even if the game went from 1 million of subs to 500k.
City of Heroes
171,000 subs worldwide (that is US + EU only)
The game loses 1k. There was a rumor again coming from F13 saying that the subs fell to just something more than 100k. I didn't bite the leaf and it looks like my guess was correct, the game is holding well for the moment. After the release of City of Villains it lost something and that's probably even the trend for the future. The game doesn't seem to have a very good stickiness and the players need a motivation to continue to invest on this game. I didn't see any announcements about a future expansion or new developments, so I suspect the game will start to leak subs at an increased rate if they don't find ways to rise the interest again (and the patch cycles are abysmally slow).
Auto Assault
?
Uhm.. No subs numbers for this game. NCSoft considered it a failure and I think noone is surprised. Till we don't have any better source I'll stick with that 10k guess.
Guild Wars
2M boxes sold worldwide.
That number is almost all about the US+EU market since the game didn't sell much in the other countries. After seeing the last expansion constantly on top of the charts I was expecting to see the total number of boxes sold at around 2.5 millions, instead it looks like it sold only 400k or less. I still think the game is doing rather well and proportionately to its "worth", overall. I'll write some more about this below.
--
General considerations: there's one aspect in what F13 wrote that is correct, while the subs in Korea for Lineage and Lineage 2 dropped consistently, it looks like the "sales" remained quite constant. So here I really don't know what to say since I have no clue about how things work and how it can be possible. The game doesn't look that popular anymore but it seems that NCSoft still gains from it. The two games together represent still 70% of NCSoft total income (of which, 55% just in Korea).
Now what I'm noticing with some very rough math is that 40% of Lineage 1&2 subs (1 million of subs) is coming from countries not listed in their region graph:
By region, Korea stood at 55% of total net sales, North America at 18%, Europe 11%, Japan 9%, and royalties accounted for 7%.
This is what NCSoft is cashing, right? If this is true it basically means that 40% of those subs only consist in 7% of the net sales, which tells a lot about how much money is actually coming back from those countries. Apply this reasoning to WoW and all those millions of subscriptions coming from China and you can see how the success of the game needs to be recalibrated (and we already knew how cheap is playing games in those countries).
I mean, the net sales for both of those games in Korea are 47 billion Won, only 0.2 billion Won are coming from other games. But 40% of what we consider subscribers for those games aren't directly property of NCSoft but come in the form of Royalties. Well, these royalties only bring in their pockets 5.7 billion Won. So those 40% of subs only bring a "real" 12% income.
About Guild Wars. As I wrote above I think the success of the game is proportionate to its worth, even if I was expecting this last expansion to sell more. Now the point is that the expectations of both Arena.net and NCSoft were consistently more optimistic. I don't know if I read all these numbers correctly but Arena.net still operates at a loss. Despite the latest sales it still loses more than one million won this year (and I really don't know how to read the charts, are those numbers cumulative between 2Q 06 and 1Q 06 or they need to be summed?). If we look at what happened before we see that it lost 11 billion Won in 2004 and another 4 billion Won in 2005 (even here, it's 15 billion total or the chart is progressive?). When exactly are they expecting to see profits instead of losses?
They surely have a great technology but it's still unlikely that Guild Wars will see an increase of sales (if I read those charts correctly). Each expansion will likely sell less than the one before just because the game and technology they sell is still essentially the same, but still sold at full price. I still think that the game IS successful. It is one of the few at the top of the charts and sold more than two millions of boxes. Now the point is to consider if the business model they tried was viable or not, because, again, the game performed rather well.
At the same time the "operating profit", that is the net sales less the operating costs is still positive everywhere. So Arena.net is leaking money or not?
Payroll costs in overseas consolidated subsidiaries were 9.1 billion Won, up 7% QoQ. This is due primarily to staff increases at the company’s ArenaNet studio in NA.
Total headcount for NCsoft and its subsidiaries was down 1% QoQ.
In North America, revenue increased thanks to the successful Q206 launch of Guild Wars Factions.
A mystery.
I also wonder were are counted the costs of Tabula Rasa development.
Of those 330 billion Won they are "predicting" for the end of the year, only 110 they have collected in this half. So they expect to reach 220 (100% increase) in the next six months? How? The only two games coming out are Dungeon Runners and the new expansion for Guild Wars.
Submitted by Abalieno on June 24, 2006 - 09:31.
SirBruce on Q23 about the subscription numbers of CoX and Auto Assault, related to yesterday's layoff news:
The rumor reported on f13 is just flat out wrong. An unnamed source close to the games in question has indicated to me that CoH is at about 160K right now, and that AA is over "a little higher" than 10K.
I'm reporting this because it makes sense.
You can see my report for Q1 06. CoX had around 180k by the end of March, it's just not possible that it lost 40% of the subscribers in a couple of months. Not even with a total revamp gone completely wrong.
About Auto Assault, well, they were just clueless if they were expecting something else.
Plus some infos about Guild Wars that were known:
Guild Wars sold 1.5 million of it's initial game, and about 500K so far for the expansion. It certainly doesn't have 2 million active players. Even if everyone buys the expansion, you're still not going to make anyway NEAR the money would would have with an MMO. I mean, an MMO is basically like selling a .5 - 1.0 boxes per month per subscriber. You just can't compete with that revenue stream with a non-sub title unless your MMO does really poorly.
Guild Wars was an experiment, and although it's sold well for a PC game title, it's not produced anywhere near the MMO levels of revenue NCSoft wanted. The idea was to see if 5-10x as many people would play an almost-MMO as a non-MMO, if there was no monthly fee. Answer: No.
Not really agree with his analysis, though. Guild Wars isn't a mmorpg that could have gathered millions of paying subscribers and, in fact, I believe that the 1.5 - 2 million boxes sold ARE 4-5x the number of active subscribers it could have brought along (if not less).
Even here it wasn't smart to expect much more. If they were.
Submitted by Abalieno on May 8, 2006 - 07:23.
(previous report)
This last report arrived much earlier than expected. We have already the results updated to the end of March 06.
The .zip file with the original pdf document can be downloaded here.
Before going in detail I underline the fact that Tabula Rasa may not be ready for this year and get delayed again. My comment: they say "conservative asssumption", I say "it's pretty sure". Along with Vanguard this is another game that seems to fear the public but sooner or later they'll have to face it. And then we'll see how quickly all the hype will melt. You can hide only for so long. Both Garriott and McQuaid are victims of their own success.
Here are the three pages mirrored with the detailed numbers for every game:
- Detailed report for Lineage
- Detailed report for Lineage II
- Detailed report for City of Heroes and Guild Wars
Extrapolated data:
Lineage
1,497,297 subs worldwide
9.759 in the US
These numbers are rather shocking and I even find hard to believe them. In four months L1 lost nearly 800k, all of them in Korea. There must be a logic explanation because the profit didn't budge (see below) and the highest concurrent user peak doesn't mirror the loss. The number of subscriptions in NA instead looks constant, with a negligible +700 subs in the last four months. Constant also the performance of the game in the other territories (+40k in China).
Lineage II
1,302,340 subs worldwide
89,337 in US + EU
L2 loses another 200k in these last four months, again the loss is all localized in Korea. And again without a significant change in the highest concurrent user peak. The game lost 50k in China (looks like they moved on L1) and is up 13k in EU+US. Notice the trend: subs down in Korea and up in the western market. Things are really odd. 90k in our market is truly surprising for a game like L2. In particular so long after release. It is also possible that this is due to a major update that drew the attention of some players. It looks like it worked better for the western market than the Korean one. Two scenarios (about Korea's reaction): the players are pissed off by the changes (or) the competition is becoming so strong that it just wasn't enough.
City of Heroes
182,858 subs worldwide (which is US + EU only)
This seems to hold rather well (-12k) considering there were zero updates in the last months. Development is slow but the retention seems decent. My idea is that the game has a very high churn but still appeals to new players and many former subscribers often return for some fun. I see it as a game with "loose ties" but where former players gladly return for some familiar fun.
Guild Wars
Roughly 1,5M boxes sold in US + EU, which is the great majority of the market.
Not much to comment here. The game seems to do fairly well and it will be interesting to see the sales of the recently released expansion. I'm relly curious about why the game wasn't accepted at all in Korea. You would expect products to be more or less popular, but the difference is just too huge to be seen as just "different taste and preference".
General considerations: recently NCSoft released a pretentious press release stating that Lineage 2 "reached more than 14-million customers". We already know that these are opened accounts and not active subscribers. Looking at the negative trends I underlined above I think it was used as damage control. I don't know the situation of the market in Korea but it looks like the competition is getting more rabid and NCSoft doesn't seem to have an easy life. The loss in both L1 and L2 could be the result of this increasing competition and Blizzard's counterattack (archived since it risked to vanish from the internet). Interesting because Blizzard is pushing to impose the monthly fee as the standard even in Korea. It's also interesting to notice that the highest concurrent user peaks for both L1 and L2 aren't so huge. Right now WoW outperforms both by a wide margin in both NA and EU. At the matter of facts it looks like the Korean market needs to be downsized from the fancy image we got of it along these years. It's still huge and more varied, but there are different trends going on that must be understood and that make it appear much better than how it actually is.
Some other facts extrapolated from their "Result Explanation":
For the quarter ending March 31, 2006, consolidated net sales declined to 78 billion Won, down 19% QoQ. Operating profit was 8.7 billion Won, down 57% QoQ and pretax profit was 10.1 billion Won, a decrease of 56% QoQ.
Now I'm not a market analyst so it's kind of hard to interpret these numbers correctly, but I'll add some more quotes that I find interesting:
Sales Mix by Geography
By region, Korea stood at 63% of total net sales, North America at 15%, Europe 5%, Japan 10%, and royalties accounted for 7%.
For Q4 2005 it was 51% Korea and 27% NA. It's interesting how the penetration in Europe is really small, despite WoW demonstrated that there's a potential market bigger than the one in NA.
Online Game Sales Mix by Games
Breaking out sales by product showed Lineage, Lineage II, City of Heroes/Villains, and Guild Wars at 42%, 40%, 9%, and 9% respectively in online game sales.
Consolidated Lineage sales were 30 billion Won, up 1% QoQ.
Lineage sales in Korea were 28.3 billion Won, up 2% QoQ.
Lineage sales in overseas consolidated subsidiaries (North America and Japan) were 1.8 billion Won, a decrease of 300 million Won.
Consolidated Lineage II sales were 29.1 billion Won, down 4% QoQ.
Lineage II sales in Korea were 20.7 billion Won, with little change QoQ.
Lineage II sales in overseas consolidated subsidiaries were 8.4 billion Won, a decrease of 1.1 billion Won.
Consolidated City of Heroes/Villains franchise sales were 6.5 billion Won, down 58% QoQ due to decreases in box sales for City of Villains in North America and Europe.
In Korea, City of Hero officially launched on March 22.
Guild Wars sales were 6.3 billion Won, down 57% QoQ.
These decreases came primarily from a decline in box sales QoQ in North America and Europe and the disappearance of additional revenue recognized in 4Q ’05 from changes in the revenue recognition method.
Guild Wars officially launched on January 27 in Japan.
Exteel officially launched on January 25 in Korea.
In Korea, operating profit was 10 billion Won, with little change QoQ.
In North America and Europe, operating profit turned to red. The primary reason for this loss was a decline in box sales for City of Villains and Guild Wars.
In Japan, operating profit was 3.3 billion Won, a result from the continued strong Lineage franchise sales and Guild Wars official launch.
And more juicy tidbits, with a (possible) interesting announce:
As we did not have any major product launch in 1Q ’06, our financial results for the quarter have weakened QoQ. However, these results are not materially different from what we originally anticipated.
However, we have reduced our previous earnings guidance to 353 billion Won from 396 billion Won on the top line and to 50 billion Won from 66 billion Won in operating profit.
This reflects the possibility that Auto Assault and City of Heroes/Villains could miss ‘06 sales targets. In addition, we take a conservative assumption that Tabula Rasa will not officially launch in 2006. We also carefully concluded that it would take more time to fully establish our casual games business in Korea.
NCsoft has been working hard to consistently deliver a portfolio of high quality, globally competitive game titles. Blockbuster projects such as Tabula Rasa, Aion and Lineage III along with unannounced titles from the company's Orange County, California studio, and the recently announced 3rd party studio, Spacetime from Austin, Texas are in full swing with quality game developers. In addition, we are diversifying our portfolio with games in newer genres, such as Soccer Fury, Dungeon Runners as well as a number of titles being developed in Korea that are yet to be announced.
NCsoft has for the past couple of years been focusing on building a network of development and publishing organizations in key markets around the world. Rather than being bound by short term results, NCsoft has been focusing on executing our strategy of creating a network of best-of-breed local development talents around the world that outputs a steady pipeline of contents onto a global publishing infrastructure.
NCsoft is well underway for completing this infrastructure by the end of 2006. As part of this effort, NCsoft plans to integrate all of its services including account management, billing, and authentication by the end of 2006 in Korea. That will be followed with the adoption of a unified integration plan for all NCsoft services across the globe. This platform will create enormous value for not only for NCsoft customers but for the developers around the world as well. Ultimately, NCsoft believes that building this unified global online platform will enhance its leadership position in the global online game space.
NCsoft believes that 2007 will be the year that all these efforts will bear fruit.
By the way, things are rather confusing here about who is doing what. See image and previous speculations.
They have huge ambitions there, with huge risks. I've already written my opinion about this portfolio strategy, but it will be interesting to see the impact it will have on copycats like SOE.
They are going to inflate the market in an unprecedented way. I don't think it's a wrong assumption to say that what will prevail will be the quality, and not the number of titles. But one thing is sure: the market is going to becoming more and more chaotic and disorienting.
Submitted by Abalieno on April 19, 2006 - 06:33.
And he has somewhat updated his charts even if he still displays old data or really bad guesses that aren't really that useful to interpret the situation.
Let's see if I can review the "scores" better:
World of Warcraft is given at 4.5 millions when we know that it should be above six. At least till The9 doesn't blow up in China.
Lineage I & II have obsolete or wrong data, I have the most recent numbers in my last report.
City of Heroes/Villain is also at 190k instead of the old 150k on the chart.
Final Fantasy XI doesn't release numbers since early 05 (I'm waiting for the new census, hopefully/probably after ToA's launch) but the game seems holding well in Japan, while not so well in the USA. My guess is that it has probably lost 100-150k and it should be currently at roughly 500k.
EDIT: we got a recent press-release with the launch of the game on the Xbox360:
"more than 500,000 players, and 1.7 million characters"
SOE's numbers aren't anymore reliable in any way after the mess they did with the Station pass. EQ Classic at 400k (still) is a myth that noone even remotely believes but SirBruce. EQ2's subscribers, even if maybe rising slightly in the last months, should be still less than 250k (but at least more stable than any other SOE's title) and SWG is probably closer to 100k than it is to 200k.
Dark Age of Camelot doesn't have updated numbers and I doubt Mythic will release something. But it should be surfing the 150k wave. With a not-so-encouraging trend, though.
Eve-Online is given below 80k. Old data. The last number I saw was roughly two weeks ago and it was 114k. It is possible they are losing some, but they should be able to retain the 100k at least till the next significant update (and a lot will depend on it).
What's left? Other mmorpgs are bread crumbs or odd models that it is not useful to compare. Not relevant to my eyes and to the number game.
Submitted by Abalieno on February 26, 2006 - 14:57.
NCSoft finally released a detailed report for the previous year. You can get the zipped .pdf directly from here.
These are the three pages you may find more interesting:
- Detailed report for Lineage
- Detailed report for Lineage II
- Detailed report for City of Heroes and Guild Wars
This is the data I extrapolated:
Lineage
2,293,227 subs worldwide
9,059 in US
Lineage II
1,525,497 subs worldwide
76,435 in US + EU
City of Heroes
194,000 subs worldwide (which is US + EU only)
Oddly enough it seems that Lineage gained a huge number of subscribers, in particular in Korea and at the loss of Lineage 2 that goes down from 2+ millions worldwide. Like if they got swapped. With China also contibuting to the loss of L2. Lineage instead gains 400k just in Korea and in the last three months of the year.
City of Heroes has gained nearly 50K in the last three months of 2005 and probably thanks to the release of City of Villains. Looking at the general trend it seems the game suffered heavily WoW's release (it was down to 124k) but continued to grow steadily from there.
I also notice that in Korea the number of concurrent users compared with the total subscription is *extremely low*. When Lineage was above 2 millions subs the highest daily peak was barely above 130k. The subscriptions are roughly FIFTEEN TIMES the number of the daily peak. In the US that daily peak would correspond on average to 500-700k subs max. Definitely not anything like two millions, and consider that in Korea they don't even have all the different timezones that keep the US players way more spread over the hours. In China this is even crazier, the total number of subscriptions could go up to TWENTY TIMES the number of the daily peak.
Considering City of Heroes, the highest daily peak is also very low (23k for 190k subs) if you compare it with the numbers coming from DAoC (roughly around 30k for something like 160-180k subs) or Eve (22k for 100k subs).
It is even more odd if you compare those numbers with those from Lineage 2. With only 76k of subs the daily peak goes up to 28k. Only 1/3 of the CoH subscribers logs in during a day, compared to the 60% of L2 subscribers logging in during a day. It's like looking at two extremes...
Impressive also the numbers of Guild Wars. In Korea it failed completely but it got nearly 1,300k accounts activated in the western market (US+EU).
Submitted by Abalieno on February 20, 2006 - 05:40.
First of all EQ 2 is growing quite well and is doing great as a business. SWG wasn't in that condition.
"There's a reason that we did this. The story … is kind of getting lost here…the game was losing subscribers. We had to make this game more accessible to a wider audience or eventually we would not have a business,"
And:
What actully happens is called "Market Research". This involves multiple focus groups (not like putting up a web poll.. actually a 3rd-party company with a one-way mirrored room where dev people can watch how people react to the game.. then they ask those people a number of questions). In addition to this surveying the existing userbase via volunteer surveys (which was done before and after the NGE btw). Those focus groups also included different populations including existing users.
This is Totally Retared (TM). If that's what happened I'm not surprised of the total clusterfuck. And, again, you deserve every little bit of it.
Polls, surveys, outside consulting. If this is the trend, it may be as well the tomb of the genre.
What a total waste of money and resources. Mmorpgs need competent authors with a sincere passion. Not hamster experiments.
Submitted by Abalieno on February 5, 2006 - 16:52.
I just noticed a sticky message on the forums.
It seems that Eve-Online has now more than 100.000 legit subscribers:
This Saturday the 100.000 subscriber mark was broken. As you can imagine this is a major milestone for both EVE Online and CCP. So we wanted to personally thank you for all the support and input into the game. Tomorrow we are going to find out who holds the honor of being the 100.000 subscriber and pod him a few times.
Again, thank you all and we look forward to having the new server hardware in place for you later this month. That hardware will more than triple the performance of EVE Online and provide you with an unmatch game experience.
Big, huge congratulations!
You truly deserved this success. I hope you'll continue to support this game even more than before. Push the boundaries!
Submitted by Abalieno on January 31, 2006 - 01:25.
While I didn't find the time or occasion to comment the two upcoming expansions (for the two EverQuests) and despite I must still have some notes saved somewhere, I'll comment quickly the latest news about the servers consolidation.
It starts with a curious statement:
Thanks to all of you, EverQuest II is growing.
Hence they are going to close some servers. No, really.
As the title suggests, I'm going to believe what Scott Hartsman wrote. I like the guy and I actually believe he is doing a decent work on the game. At least for what is possible and probably because I'm observing from too far away to feel the "heat of bitching" (I'm sure I would find plenty to complain about if I was playing).
But I also believe that those arguments are solid and make sense. In fact they were already part of my worries from the beginning (curiously enough, in a discussion with Scott).
The biggest problem is that consolidating some servers to make the game world feel less barren is only a temporary, superficial band-aid and not really a direct answer (that would require deeper discussions about the use of instancing and content progression. So directly the foundations of the game). But then it would be asking too much. (read also this for context)
So, is EQ2 in trouble?
I don't think it is. Or it isn't to the point to feel more worried than usual. That EQ2 wasn't as successful as expected is not a news. It's here where SOE "lies" (they won't admit this). But we still have to see how this translates to "trouble" and I'm not convinced by this perspective. There are no concrete signs of this.
If the sky is going to fall, it is going to fall on the whole company (and this wouldn't surprise me, instead), not on EQ2. The game is actually doing much better than how I expected and exactly because the hard work they are putting on it after the release. So despite they had to build on top of a wrecked game.
SWG is in a much worst condition, EQ is being pillaged and PlanetSide is going "free" to try to survive. I don't think that Matrix Online is more than a mmo zombie.
EQ2 is probably the most solid game they have at the moment.
By the way, Scott clearly stated on FoH's boards what most of us are curious about:
Right. Taken as a net, EQ2 grows every week. The sum of +new subs in, -cancels nets out to a positive number.
Taken at the individual server level, underpopulated servers make up a disproportionately large number of the -cancels component in that equation, which correlates to "Server that is not populated enough just isn't fun."
So much so, that it's in EQ2's best interest to address the problem directly, instead of dancing around it, no matter what random non-subscribing doomsayers will end up saying.
Submitted by Abalieno on December 19, 2005 - 22:00.
But without saying much that would be worth a discussion:
WORLD OF WARCRAFT® SURPASSES FIVE MILLION CUSTOMERS WORLDWIDE
Customer base reaches new heights as Blizzard Entertainment®'s MMORPG continues its growth in North America, Europe, and Asia
IRVINE, California - December 19, 2005 - Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. today announced that World of Warcraft®, its massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG), has surpassed five million customers worldwide. The subscription-based MMORPG launched approximately one year ago in North America, Australia, and New Zealand and has since released in multiple countries throughout Europe and Asia. This latest milestone comes on the heels of Blizzard Entertainment®'s recent announcement of a World of Warcraft expansion, World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade™, which will push the boundaries of the game and offer even more content and features for players.
It sounds more like a pitch for the expansion and a revindication of market leadership.
These reports don't tell much anymore since we have no clue about how the subscription numbers are divided between the zones. So we cannot know what actually would matter:
Given the nature of the business, of course, no company will post any useful numbers... But I bet they'd be interesting to compare between games. Especially the meta-data such as churn rate, return sub rate, etc.
The last relevant news were released at the end of August. Considering the last press release it's possible they reached the top.
Submitted by Abalieno on December 19, 2005 - 20:50.
And now Eve-Online is growing too fast:
Max Headroom
Red Moon Rising is out and as you have probably noticed we are still dealing with issues from the deployment. RMR is a rather big change, in many aspects close to Exodus in scope, especially at the lower levels. RMR contains many optimizations and improvements behind the scenes to deal with EVE's continued success (BTW thank you so much for that, EVE owes much of it's success to you the EVE Player community).
As the game grows and we stubbornly maintain our goal of one cluster, we have to take a more drastic approach to platform management than before. The gradual addition of hardware and on going software optimizations are not able to keep up with EVE any more. Oveur recently did an excellent blog describing our efforts.
The urgency of the situation becomes evident when we do updates of the scale of Red Moon Rising. The margin of error is virtually non-existent as we are already so close to the glass ceiling of our current cluster architecture that the smallest mis-configuration leads to us banging against it. This causes effects which we just witnessed at 15:00 GMT today.
We have been doing research into how we can considerably increase our headroom, the first step was the Ramsan, the next step involves a move to 64 bit architecture. We have brought Christian Tismer, the godfather of Stackless Python to Iceland and him and porkbelly are here at the office busy figuring out how to squeeze all potential power out of the x64 AMDs we are planning to build our next major cluster upgrade on.
Next to them Papasmurf and Dr.J are feverishly calibrating all pistons of our current cluster to focus all computing resources in the right areas so that RMR will hold the 25.000 PCU we seem destined to achieve before we manage to have the new super cluster hardware assembled, delivered, installed, tuned and tested.
The hardware needed to increase our headroom isn't something you can go to the store and buy. We have world experts assisting us and after everything has been completed the EVE cluster will probably be the first game related cluster site to rank on the Top500 list.
Anyway I wanted to offer my small reassurance that we are focused on backing our commitment to single cluster for the world wide market (The China cluster is a whole different ballgame which warrants a separate blog) and we fully realize that seriously increased hardware and R&D investment is required to back it and that will be done.
In the short term we have world leading experts in MMO development working around the clock here at the office, ignoring all other commitments (which understandably are considerable this close to Christmas). I remain in constant amazement how committed our developers are to make sure we pass each hurdle, commitment that is only matched by the understanding of their families.
In the long term we will build a completely new cluster utilizing all modern day technology to construct something at the scale needed to simulate nuclear explosions or the earth's weather system.
So this is blog is our plea to you, the EVE Player community, to yet again give us a chance to resolve these matters and to explain that we have long term and short term goals to remedy the situation as quickly as possible.
Of course EVE Online is a commercial venture but seeing what we have achieved together often makes you think otherwise. We here at CCP remain committed to keep up our end of the bargain. With your help we'll take MMOGs to the next level.
Maybe someone still remembers all the claims about the support for more than 100k "PCU" (aka "Peak Concurrent Player", CCP's definition for the maximum number of accounts logged in at the same time) back in beta. Heh...
The subscription numbers are growing at an impressive rate. Really, I expect a collapse because this is going beyond every expectation. Basically *everyone* is now giving it a try or discussing it. If anything, this confirms how important is our community and the true impact we can have on these games. This market is starting to belong more to these communities. We decide who succeeds and who fails and I'm not sure game companies are going to like how unpredictable (and unfaithful) we are.
EVE has over 100k active accounts, including trials. Active subscriptions are now over 86k.
This Sunday the number of contemporary logged in accounts was above 20k.
The 100k mark could be reached much sooner than expected. I'm actually hoping things will slow down, or this may burn both CCP and the future of the game.
Commercial success is corrupting.
Submitted by Abalieno on December 12, 2005 - 02:53.
Quick update about Eve-Online (and I'm back as a subscriber as well).
CCP's plan in September was to reach 70k subs by the end of the year but early this week Oveur announced they are already above 80k. Today the new record about concurrent users online was broken as well, going above 19k (19.486).
This means they gained more than 20k subscriptions just in the last seven months, corresponding to more than 25% in growth. Pretty outstanding. I wish they could continue with this impressive J-curve (Raph can write all he wants, but that's just the market interpreted as a sexual metaphor) but I also believe that it's too unrealistic to expect that 25% growth every few months. Still, they have gained the space to improve the game more consistently and secure a good number of loyal subscribers in the longer term.
The new major patch/expansion is planned to go live early this week (Tuesday?). The patch notes are already out but there's also the possibility that the devs won't meet the deadlines. In this case the patch will have be pushed to after the holidays.
Among the content aimed to the bigger alliances there are still many changes that will affect everyone, like the huge changes to the combat and a rebalance and power-up of the noob ships (details here). Plus the addition of four new bloodlines (one for each race) and a revision of the tutorial. It's important to notice how they work and develop at all levels, from the network infrastructure to the higher level design.
It's also noteworthy that they'll finally display the "criminal flagging". About which I ranted here in the past.
Between the other things I digged, I've been completely in awe for this flash tutorial. It's really amazing even if it just explains how the turrets work in the game. Even if you don't play the game I suggest to read it from the first to the last page because I think it really describes what Eve is at its core and why many love or hate it. Of course that's the opposite of intuitive, visceral combat. But noone could negate the huge appeal that even that type of approach can have. Really, that little tutorial is incredible. Go toy with it now because it's worth it. I've never seen something niftier and intriguing.
Finally an external program I found and that is extremely useful for me. It simply allows the game client to fill the screen while playing in a window so that you can multitasking without having to set the game client at a smaller resolution than your desktop so that the window can fit in. What it does in practice is remove the borders and the title-bar so that the window will fill the screen without leaving spaces or going off it. I tried it and it works perfectly.
Hey Lum, if I get the source-code can you port it to DAoC? :)
EDIT- I quote here the latest news since they are unavailable for non-subscribers.
We have been working hard on testing Red Moon Rising (RMR) - which is tentatively scheduled for deployment next week. Besides all the new content in RMR, we've been working hard on optimizations too, especially since the EVE universe continues to grow at a faster rate than we have ever seen before.
Recently, we deployed server optimization hotfixes seperate from optimizations made in RMR. One of the hotfixes performed beyond our expectations. We regained 25% of our CPU usage on all Proxies resulting in a noticeable lag reduction in most systems.
In addition to these optimizations, we started testing 64-bit server hardware last week on Tranquility. This is in preparation for our upcoming server upgrades - and the results are astonishing. A Proxy server previously running at 70% CPU, which came down from 95% CPU after the aforementioned optimization hotfix, is only using 25% CPU on the new 64-bit hardware.
Please note, only one of the many Proxies is running on 64-bit hardware, the testing is to make sure the replacements we are considering investing in actually give a performance increase. We feel the results speak for themselves and are moving forward in the testing and upgrade process.
--
On the RMR side of the news, we are still testing the current candidate for deployment. If testing goes as well as the hardware and software testing, we will break our Tuesday deployment cycle and RMR will go live on Thursday, 15 December. If we are not satisfied with the results of testing this deployment candidate, RMR will go live in January.
Submitted by Abalieno on November 19, 2005 - 07:28.
That it is pretty it's out of doubt.
Red Moon Rising is the upcoming free half-expansion to be released in December. The original plan was to have all features packed in Kali, the next one now scheduled for Q2 2006, but the devs decided to split the project in two in order to keep everything under control considering the sheer scope of the ongoing development.
The new screenshots just released are wonderful and finally show the "Titans", the biggest ships you will be able to control in the game.
The focus of this further step is on the warfare and PvP action but there are many more features and enhancements that are being added, starting from the client optimization to the addition of four new "asian" bloodlines (one per race) to appeal the eastern market where the game is going to be launched (and it will be truly interesting to see how it goes).
While the hugest ships aren't going to be accessible if not for those long-time and organized players that accumulated an insane wealth and the support from the largest corporations and alliances, still they reinforce the "sense of wonder" created by the absurd unbalance in the scale of the vessels. And this definitely is what a game also inspired to the Golden Age of the Space Opera should aspire to reproduce.
If at some point you'll see a Titan passing by during your travels, you'll surely remember that moment. It's something real. Those ships ARE insanely valuable and if they are destroyed they are gone. This creates a sense of ownerships and self-consistence in the game-world that sweeps off the "arcade" mood of other games with faked, trivialized environments and rulesets. In Eve things truly exist. The space is huge but in the hands of the players. And it's undeniable how all these elements are truly appealing and fascinating despite the very slow pace of the game for most of the new players and those not deeply involved in the PvP scene.
It's not surprising, considering also the steady and ambitious development, that the last press release announces nearly 80k active subscriptions even before the launch of the new expansion and the release of the game on the eastern market. (waiting for proper source)
EVE ONLINE: RED MOON RISING
CCP Announces Major Upgrade to EVE Online
REYKJAVIK, ICELAND – November 18st, 2005 – CCP Games, an independent developer and publisher of massively multiplayer online games, today announced the public release of "EVE Online®: Red Moon Rising”, a new expansion to its highly successful and fast-growing Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game (MMORPG) “EVE Online®: Exodus”. Red Moon Rising is scheduled for release this December, and will be provided to subscribers free of charge.
“Red Moon Rising is the last of the EXODUS chapters and is the precursor of the Kali expansion," said Magnus Bergsson, CMO of CCP Games. “Players will see new ships and features in Red Moon Rising created explicitly to augment warfare, so those who crave the adrenaline rush of action-packed PVP will really enjoy this release!”
With nearly 80,000 active subscribers and over 17,000 simultaneous users on one server, “EVE Online” is the largest independently developed and published MMORPG on the market.
“The introduction of these new components is analogous to adding rooks, knights, and the mighty queen to a galactic chessboard,” said Nathan Richardsson, Lead Producer for EVE Online. “Fighters, carriers, and titans are going to take combat to a scale that the MMPORG genre has never seen before. In addition, the sheer economics required just to produce these leviathans will create great opportunities for industrious-minded gamers to take advantage of.”
EVE Online®: Red Moon Rising is the march towards an epic clash between the empires as the tentative peace presiding over the galaxy continues to slip away. Nations begin to conspire against one another, secretly preparing for the inevitable conflict that threatens to redefine the borderlines of EVE forever.
Some of the key features of this upgrade are:
* Titans: The largest, most fearsome space faring battle vessels ever created
* Carriers: Front line capital ships providing fighter coverage and support for fleets
* Bloodlines: The addition of Asian bloodlines available to each of the races
* COSMOS Constellation Expansion: Addition of constellation missions to Gallente and Amarr territories
* Fighters: The main offensive and defensive weapon of the Carrier
* Starbases and sovereignty: Additions of roles to improve control access of services and improved calculations of player-determined Sovereignty
* Next-Generation Manufacturing & Research Facilities: Mass-manufacturing enabling and remote industry management.
* Performance Optimizations: Optimizations to core systems to provide even better performance.
* Mining Industry Upgrade: New equipment, ships and skills for miners
* Combat Enhancements: Varied improvements to combat, enhanced defenses and configuration overhauls
* Jettisoned Canister Flagging: Removing the contents of a jettisoned canister that is not your own will flag you as a thief
* Drone Enhancements: New drone capabilities and improved performance
* An Eye for an Eye: You are allowed to revenge the unlawful destruction of your ship
* Tech II: 23 new Tech II ships, including destroyers, battlecruisers and mining barges
* New Corporate Logos: Corporations have more options to create their own identity
* NPC Changes: New NPC's featuring elite ships with advanced capabilities such as cap draining
* UI Improvements: Need info from Hagen. (lol?)
* Full Unicode Client: The EVE client now supports any language in the universe
This while they speak about "growing pains":
What you guys need to be aware of, however, is that due to CCP’s ongoing growth spurt, we’ve presently hit the absolute limit with regards to how many people we can fit in our current housing. We physically cannot add more people until we move to our new facilities (a move currently scheduled for next month). Therefore, to meet current production schedules with available manpower, our focus needs to remain squarely on static content for the time being.
Our company’s having growing pains, but once they’re past us we’ll be better equipped to bring you a more well-rounded gaming experience.
And fancy projects to spare some space for the exponential growth:
64bits
A common cause for node deaths is memory exhaustion. Sometimes this is due to some memory-eating monsterbug, but often the virtual address space of 2GB in a 32-bit process simply fills up with legitimate user data. No matter how much memory is installed on the machine, each process can only address 2GB of this.
In order to alleviate this and to buy us more room for growth, we have been working on porting the server binaries to the new x64 architecture and have them run as 64 bit processes under Windows 2003 server 64, or even XP 64.
The ~150k subscriptions of City of Heroes aren't that far away. We'll see for how long this will be considered "niche" or "outlier".
The GoonFleet may also help:
It's a completely different game than it was in beta/launch.
What the hell...I'm game. I'm sick of WoW. And since I've been busy at work lately, this sounds like a good game to get stuff done while I do work with the mining and all.
As new people can see, the devs maintain a very active and responsive relationship with the player base. They frequently post on the online forums in response to threads commenting/complaining about changes, and make an effort to justify their decisions in a way SOE never would.
Btw, they added an into movie to the game with a voice narrating the backstory and mostly-static beautiful art screens to illustrate it. It sets the mood rather well.
Fascinating, indeed.
Submitted by Abalieno on August 30, 2005 - 01:01.
World of Warcraft breaks the 1 million mark just for NA subscribers:
IRVINE, California - August 29, 2005 - Blizzard Entertainment®, Inc. today announced that World of Warcraft®, its subscription-based massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG), has reached more than one million paying customers in North America. This brings the total population for Blizzard's critically acclaimed game, the largest MMORPG in the world, to more than four million paying customers.
"It's very rewarding to see so many new and returning players logging in to play World of Warcraft daily," said Mike Morhaime, president and cofounder of Blizzard Entertainment. "With the continued support of our retail partners, World of Warcraft has reached more than one million paying customers in North America well before its one-year anniversary in November. We would like to express our appreciation to both the players and our retail and license partners for helping us make World of Warcraft one of the most popular online games in the world."
World of Warcraft's Paying Customer Definition
World of Warcraft customers include individuals who have paid a subscription fee or purchased a prepaid card to play World of Warcraft, as well as those who have purchased the installation box bundled with one free month access. Internet Game Room players having accessed the game over the last seven days are also counted as customers. The above definition excludes all players under free promotional subscriptions, expired or canceled subscriptions, and expired pre-paid cards. Customers in licensees' territories are defined along the same rules.
My comment is still the same with the difference that this time I'm really surprised (past considerations).
I know that the game is still a best seller but I was expecting the subscription numbers to remain steady or just slightly rise. Balanced by the players leaving the game (the game is popular between younger players, which I considered less reliable long-term subscribers).
I underlined Mike Morhaime quote for a reason. WoW is considered the "fast food" of mmorpgs but I was wrong to believe that this fast food had a short life. In fact I still believe that the game has an high churn rate (people unsubscribing) but this is constantly compensated by returning players. McDonald's is a fast food and we can criticize it on the quality of the food, but I don't think today it has less customers than a few years ago. As McDonald's, WoW is now conquering popularity (and unpopularity) all over the world exporting its own style. A successful style. As I already wrote this game is becoming more than a game and nearer to a cultural phenomenon.
Half a billion dollars a year. PC gaming is dead?
No, just owned.
Psyae commented on Ethic's blog:
This is it. Finally, Bliz cracked the code opening the portal to this nth dimension. It’s what the geeks, the nerds, the hackers, the power gamers, the entrepreneurs, the closet RPers, the closet PVPers, the heroes, the maidens, the X-ers, the modernized baby boomers, the quiet, the loud, the you, and the me can all play together, simultaneously, daily, infinitely, and get a boatload of pleasure from it without feeling ashamed that you spend more of your “offtime? playing a game than hanging out with your kids because your kids are playing it, too. This is secretly what we’ve all been waiting for, and boom, it’s here. Sure, it’s not perfect, but, then again, neither is real life.
More then before it's absolutely necessary that other companies shape their own strong identity that can be presented as an alternative. Going directly against Blizzard is now completely insane.
Submitted by Abalieno on August 24, 2005 - 16:46.
Follow-up.
From the boards:
"Due to the efforts of the Marketing team, magazines and player recommendations, EVE now has over 65k active accounts and close to another 15k on trial.
We are on track for over 75k active accounts before the end of the year."
Actually I'm starting to believe that they are pushing the marketing right now at its best and they cannot keep this pace for too long. A slow, steady growth is still possible, though and it will just do good to the game in the long term.
As long they keep working on the game as they are doing now.
Submitted by Abalieno on August 17, 2005 - 02:21.
After the server statistics I pasted below I think it's useful to take another, completely different example:
Does it look different? Eve-Online has seen a constant, regular growth of subscriptions from the release of its first expansion till today. The launch of CoH, WoW and other games didn't affect it in the slightest.
What I find interesting and amusing is how this game is able to shatter all the commonplaces I use to hear. For example the commonplace that a "bad launch" is a disaster that cannot be recovered for a mmorpg. We have examples like Anarchy Online, Shadowbane and... Eve-Online. Often the poor results of the first two games are "excused" and ascribed to just the bad launch, not the game. Well, Eve-Online had one AWFUL launch following months of desperate beta phases. I won't go in the details but I followed this game closely and I was in the beta since the August of the previous year (the game was released in May). I had high expectations about it and as I joined I was positively impressed. Then things started to go wrong all around. The devs decided to basically rewrite everything, from the netcode and the server backbone to the whole UI (which was redone completely 5-6 times just in the beta). From the second phase in September to the third only a week or two were supposed to pass. Instead the game was stuck for more than a month (with a release planned for early December) and when we finally were able to log in again the status was horrible at best. Nothing was working, the lag was massive and the game was simply unplayable. But aside these "details" the point was that the game was going downhill and the situation just became worst as the time passed and I was between those believing that the game was just going to fail at that point.
The launch went badly. The beta was used like a huge public trial version and only a few players decided that the game was worth something. One day before release the server were still badly lagged and most of the game just didn't work or had the majority of the features planned removed and forgotten.
It couldn't have gone worst than that. In particular if you add that the game had relevant problems with the distribution and never reached the shops in NA.
If we follow the commonplace at this point, it's obvious how this game would be doomed. It would have been impossible to get players back if the commonplace was correct and valid as it was for AO and Shadowbane. In particular if we consider how the setting of the game is way less popular. Shadowbane seems to have fallen below 20k of subscriptions despite its supposed appeal and genre, Anarchy Online about the same and they are probably counting the free accounts. Both games don't have much to say anymore. And Eve?
These are interesting times we live in. EVE now has more than 64 thousand subscribers, we are releasing more content faster and we have at least 5 expansions worth of features and content just waiting to be implemented.
Not bad for a sci-fi game where you cannot even see and move your avatar and where the whole gameplay is mostly about spreadsheets and slow paced interactions that bore to tears 99% of the players giving it a try.
How this could have happened? It's simple, the subscriptions depend on the unique qualities of a game. Eve-Online has those unique qualities and was able to break completely the awful trends in both the development and game mechanics. You don't hear from them planning for new games like Mythic, SOE, Wolfpack and everyone else is doing. Their whole team is completely focused on *this* game. All their resources, talent and work is going into a precise direction. They *believe* in the game and kept believing into it from day one when everything seemed to go wrong. Instead of trying to bail off they just kept working harder and now they see the result of that work and that attitude. Guess what? Now they don't need to hype new games and promise they learnt from their mistakes. Because the fact they learnt is blatantly obvious from the quality that the game reached.
This is probably the best "Virtual World" we have out there. It's not just a polished combat simulation like every other game out there. The players have an impact on the world. The PvP model is open and interesting and there's a direct interaction with the environment. The players aren't figures moving on a fixed background and growing e-peens. Instead they ARE the game, affect the game and create stories and dynamic situations. Give this a look. Recently CCP added the possibility to conquer and control entire star systems and build space stations. This doesn't happen in a fucking private instance where noone can enter. This happens right in the world that everyone shares. That same world that just a few days ago reached more than 13k characters logged in at the same time.
The development follows this attitude. They know that in order to keep a "Virtual World" alive they cannot work on optional expansions. A "Virual World" is a cohesive effort, you cannot plan it as retared optional patches. In fact this is exactly what they are doing. They develop expansion but they are included in the monthly fee and released to everyone.
What I wrote not long ago is still valid and confirmed by the developers themselves. They didn't paint themselves in a corner chasing that stupid model of the mudflation to excuse the production of more content. They don't need that because a self-consistent Virtual World already implicitly holds a depth and a potential that are just endless. Thinking about sequels or exansions is simply ridiculous because you will already have so many ideas of cool new features to implement and integrate with the game. And you don't have pass time to figure out what to invent next because your shoulder e-peens cannot become bigger than that.
we are releasing more content faster and we have at least 5 expansions worth of features and content just waiting to be implemented.
You might not have noticed a lot, but this is understandable. Small gradual improvements over a long period of time tend not to register and most of what we did was in preparation for KALI. Sounds strange doesn't it?
KALI is much more than "more features". KALI is a brand new code branch. Remember EXODUS? Remember the performance increases that client had compared to the old Castor client? That was because EXODUS was a new code branch where we could start large overhauls and even rewrites to major systems.
The main thing I didn't convey in the previous blog was that KALI is so much more than just new features. It includes A LOT of improvements, performance increases and system rewrites.
They don't sit on their asses and do not postpone the development of new features to different projects. They don't need to plan sequels to realize the potential of their ideas and they demonstrated more than once how every part of the game can be expanded and rewritten in a RADICAL level. Constantly trying to push the potential of the game instead of sit back and surrender to the flaws. Or, even worst, keeping trying to work around them, gliding on the surface.
So let's speak of those retarded common places that are so diffused. Let's speak of horrible launches, let's speak of the lack of retail boxes on the shops, let's speak of the need to plan sequels in order to get new subscribers, let's speak of product lifecycles.
I love how this game and this company are shattering every single one of these stupid commonplaces. Keep going and good work.
P.S.
Since I was remembering the old times... How much I hated "Campion", that stupid producer that I'm sure was responsible for more than one disaster in a way or another. I passed all the time in the beta arguing with him and receiving back retarded answers. How happy I was when he finally left CCP a few months after the launch (before they went independent and the game started to see the positive trend). And how happy I am NOW that I read that he also had to leave Turbine and MEO after having joined the last year as the producer (read on Gamerifts).
Keep that guy away from your games.
Submitted by Innsmouth on July 26, 2005 - 01:40.
Just to archive semi-old data for my "subscriptions" category.
About the situation of Guild Wars, a post from SirBruce:
NCsoft has announced sales figures for Guild Wars. The game sold 650,000 copies in the US and Europe, but only 27,000 in Korea. Total sales are about US$27.5m versus US$50m forecast.
Arenanet's operate costs are about US$9m/year. Guild Wars itself cost ~US$16m, including marketing costs. If NCSoft is committed to the product, they're going to have to release 1.5 - 2 expansions a year and hope they sell consistently to keep the game profitable.
--
Since NCsoft is also the publisher, it's all theirs, minus COGS of course, but how much does A.Net get? That's the real question. If it's a set percentage, then they might not be, as a "division", profitable. If NCSoft decides to operate it at a "loss", that's fine, so long as the company is making money overall.
But you'd better believe they need to do expansions within three years, because you left out development costs. Box sales have recouped the games costs and covered A.Net for one year, but each year it's going to cost about $9M a year to operate. So you have to generate at least that much in box sales every year through expansions, plus however much it costs to actually produce that expansion -- probably not as much as the whole game itself, but still, not chump change. And you have, of course, opportunity cost to consider -- sure, maybe GW is making money, but is it really the best use of NCSoft's money, or could they make more with a traditional subscription-based game?
Now, 1-2 GW expansion per year should be okay, even if only half the people who bought the first box buy the second one, but you don't want that number to keep declining or you'll be in trouble really quick. Also, A.Net had already missed its first "window" for an expansion; they won't have one until next year. So it remains to be seen if they are even CAPABLE of delivering on schedule.
More data about the situation in Korea at Terra Nova.
Someone also doubted od the possible failure since the 26-27k reported is about the licences sold to PC-bangs and not actual subscription numbers. It seems that Lineage 1 has just around 19k of those licences active. Which would transform the apparent complete failure of the game into a huge success.
The numbers on Terra Nova contradict this hypothesis, though. So it's hard to understand what is going on.
--
About Eve-Online the situation is more clear. CCP is organizing to try to push the game in the eastern market as well but for now there are just normal subscriptions following a positive, always growing trend. Which is the best a mmorpg could aspire to and that rewards one of the most original and less derivative products out there.
11.7.2005 - New Online Record
Yesterday, Sunday, you set a new online player record when 12.895 of you were playing at the same time! No reports of lag were reported, the 'cold war edition' seems to have yet again lessened the server load.
More details about the actual subscription numbers from a rather recent post on the forums:
1. How many suscribers does EVE currently have?
I think we just went past 60.000 paying subscribers the other day. That means an active account which is being paid for and is the industry standard for "subscriber".
< |
